The Rights and Virtues of Citizenship.
Can a Nation Survive as Free People with out Public Virtues?






The Framers of our Constitution were concerned by the lack of a bill of rights in the final document. The disagreements were significant and two members of the Virginia Delegation refused to sign without it. The debate in the press after the document was made public ran somewhat like this: “We don’t need one the government is too tightly restricted anyway.” “So why not write that more clearly?” “If we did that we might leave things out, and then the document would be useless” “But if we had a basic list we could always amend it.” If we are always amending it, how do we keep the original list in it?” “How would we avoid the list becoming a final list and preventing the later remembered or discovered rights from being abused.?” And the Hamiltonian argument: “Such a list will be used as a cudgel to protect more and more extreme forms of each freedom until the law is meaningless.”
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Howard Marler Museum Collection Notes to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.